Never Back Down Review

One of the Worst Films of 2008

© Mike Lippert

Jan 29, 2009
Uninspired, cliche ridden film for adrenaline hungry teenagers misses the mark and then some.

Jake Tyler (Sean Faris) has two unfortunate vices in Never Back Down that render him almost completely dramatically inert: he’s a scrapper and has a dead father. This means that, every time someone mentions the latter, he wants to engage in a little of the former. And you can bet your last dollar that he rips open that cardboard box with the label “useless junk” sprawled across the side to get dear ol’ dad’s coaching jersey before going to beat the hell out of the school bully during the climax. Yep, it’s that predictable.

Born for UFC?

Jake has moved to Orlando in order for his little brother to pursue a promising career in tennis. Orlando is a good place for Jake as there seems to be an absence of the law. When he beats three guys almost to death in broad daylight out of pure road rage, not only is he not brought up on changes, or even approached by the cops, but becomes something a hero when a video of the incident shows up on YouTube. Only in America

Worst Film of 2008?

Jake’s desire, if not already gathered, is to kick butt and chew bubble gum. And, as the cliche goes, you can bet that there’s no Juicy Fruit anywhere to be seen. During his first day of class, the teacher lectures on Achilles which is darn lucky for the film’s sake because A) it provides an painfully obvious symbolic parallel, and B) Jake's answer to a question saves the fiery blonde Baja (Amber Heard) from having to answer herself.

Why is that convenient? Because it gets him an invite to a party where Ryan McCarthy is waiting to put Jake in his place, who was notorious before his arrival for an online video of him brawling during a football game. So popular is this video that kids watch it on their cell phones and iPods as he is walking past in the hall. Sure they do.

McCarthy is played by Cam Gigandet who looks like he is having a lot of fun in that way that only bad actors can when they don’t begin to realize that they are giving a truly terrible performance. Needless to say, the scrawny but ripped McCarthy gives Jake a beat down in front of half the school, leaving him without his dignity.

This prompts Jake to seek out Jean Roqua, a master of mixed martial arts who runs a local gym. Roqua is played (not so greatly) by Djimon Hounsou, that great African actor from such films as Blood Diamond and In America. Hounsou, whose performances are usually filled with passion and fire, brings remarkably little to the Roqua role, but it’s not really his fault, there’s remarkably little to be brought to it in the first place.

Mixed Martial Arts

So Jake, with an unending desire for revenge, begins to train under Roqua, whose one rule is that his students engage in absolutely no fighting outside of the gym. Is anyone willing to bet that the rule will eventually get broken? Didn’t think so. It leads however, to an emotional exchange in which Jake finds out that Roqua has not seen or spoken to his father back in Africa since the death of his brother, who he was blamed for. Who's willing to bet that the last shot of Roqua will be of him holding an airplane ticket? Also didn’t think so.

Where Jake’s fighting needs work is in his form. He’s gets too angry and comes at his opponent with all of his strength. Luckily Roqua teaches him valuable lessons like how to breathe between each punch, which will strengthen the total impact of the blow. Their relationship rarely ever goes much deeper than this.

What irks Jake even more is that Baja, who he has taken quite the shiner to, turns out to actually be McCarthy’s girl. Of course she is. But what would a girl like Baja really see in a guy like McCarthy, who only seems to be happy when he is inflicting pain on others?

The Baja/McCarthy relationship is completely superfluous; just one more contrivance that the script piles on, leading up to that fateful moment during the climax when a fully trained Jake and McCarthy exchange blows once again. Who's willing to bet that….ah nevermind.

Verdict

There is not one good scene in Never Back Down, not one good line of dialogue, not one character drawn fully enough to care about. Instead it’s a celebration of testosterone: of ripped abs, pulsating biceps, sweaty chests, etc. It glories in those moments of fists connecting with jaws and ankles intercepting ribcages, with director Jeff Wadlow and his editors go into overdrive trying to make the fights as intense and romantic as possible.

That said, it's sometimes possible to get in a funny sort of mood and let some movie’s slip by the critical safety net, enjoying them for what they are, not expecting anything more. That was the case with Step Up 2, whose danceathon The Streets, is exactly the same as Never Back Down’s climactic fight tournament in that both are underground events, held at secret locations, that one is invited to by a cell phone text, received the night before.

Sure, it was dumb, but in a sweet and innocent way that didn’t mean any harm, not to mention those impressive dance numbers. Never Back Down however, is kind of laughable in its mediocrity. The situation is so exaggerated and is so driven by the formulaic needs of the screenplay that it is next to impossible to care about the hero and his quest to prove himself better than the enemy but beating him into the pavement. Too bad for the pavement.

Rating: 1 out of 5

For a complete list of 2008's worst films click here


The copyright of the article Never Back Down Review in Martial Arts Films is owned by Mike Lippert. Permission to republish Never Back Down Review in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Aug 18, 2009 8:09 PM
Guest :
Sorry bro. But I dont think this movie is one of the worst of 2008. I found the Story very powerfull, you would ask me why? All the characters of the movie CHANGE for a good reason, thinks doesnt happens becose the writer thought it was cool, yeah I undestand the topic is kinda teenager, but aswell I found this film perfectly well shoot. Good figthing scenes, no that much of drama melodrama, and good montages, I wont say is the best of 2008, but is not the worst. You can say this is not realistic, yeah true. but do you think HARRY POTTER IS? :) I like the direction of the film and the cool shots, not much into the story but have a meaning, and is not that randome.

Cheers.
Aug 18, 2009 9:27 PM
Mike Lippert :
I'm glad you enjoyed the movie, as long as it has entertained someone it had served it's purpose, I however found it offensively cliche and uninspired, hated most of the characters and didn't care whether they succeeded in the end. To answer your question, no I don't think Harry Potter is realistic but it belongs to the fantasy genre which is fueled by the unrealistic, however for the sake of argument, I'd say stuff like the Yule Ball from Harry Potter 4 are more realistic and affecting in terms of human drama than anything in Never back Down. You should also check out Fighting with Channing Tatum, which is about the same kind of stuff but recieved a stronger critical reception.
2 Comments